Short List
Posted by Fred Jandt
Editor, Mass Transit magazine
This week celebrates the third annual Dump the Pump Day, which looks to be bigger than either of the previous years as gas prices across the nation soar above $4 a gallon. Transit is already posting increases in all modes and as the summer ramps up there looks to be even greater jumps in ridership.
This week also brought the announcement of the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) “short list” of host cities for the 2016 Summer Olympics. The list of applicants has been whittled down to just four: Tokyo, Madrid, Chicago and Rio de Janeiro. Now comes the arduous process of providing detailed files on their Olympics plans and hosting a visit by the IOC’s Evaluation Commission. The host city will be selected via a secret ballot in October 2009.
Of the potential host cities, Chicago ranked third in terms of a technical evaluation, listing among other things infrastructure, transportation, venues, finances and security. Tokyo ranked first and Madrid came in second.
According the IOC report, it questioned Chicago’s $27 billion planned investment in highway and transit projects and said the city provided a “lack of detail” in terms of transportation plans between venues.
Chicago is banking on this Olympic bid to bring in billions of dollars in revenue for the city and its environs. Even up here in the Milwaukee area, there is talk of this bid helping to bring in revenue to local businesses and help bolster funding for highway and transit projects.
But Chicago has a long way to go before the October 2, 2009 vote deadline rolls around. Both Madrid and Tokyo boast excellent transportation systems. Tokyo’s transit system is touted as among the best in the world and having travelled on Madrid’s in the last year, I can attest to how well its system works.
And what does Chicago have in comparison? How about a series of rolling Doomsday Deadlines in the last year? A state legislature that can’t agree on how to fund one of the three largest transit systems in the United States?
If Chicago gets the bid for the 2016 Olympics it will be the first United States city to host the Summer Olympics in 20 years, since Atlanta hosted them in 1996. Planning for this bid has been ongoing for years, but how much a part of that has included transit?
I hear more along the lines of “wait until we get the Olympic bid, we’re really going to beef up the transit system then” rather than, “let’s beef up the transit system to help us get the Olympic bid.”
Transit shouldn’t be an afterthought for an Olympic bid. It shouldn’t even be integral to the bid itself. Transit should be built up regardless of the bid. It’s kind of like cleaning your house when you’re planning for guests to come over. Don’t just clean up when guests come over. You should clean all the time, because even if the guests cancel, you still have a clean house.
Chicago should have been investing in transit all along. That way if they don’t get the 2016 bid, they still would have an excellent transit system.
Thanks for reading the MT Position updated every Friday,

June 20th, 2008 at 7:13 am
Specifically there is some belief in Milwaukee that if Chicago gets the bid there will be more support for building a rail line that would run from Milwaukee to Kenosha and hook up with METRA from Chicago. This idea seems pretty far fetched to me but anything to help jump start rail in Milwaukee is a plus!
June 20th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
They came in third in tech. review. Chicago won’t get the bid. I concur, they should plan transit for the citizens, not some committee. I remember the limerick of my youth…”CHICken on A car, car can’t GO…that’s how you spell Chicago”. Seems nothing else is moving in this city, either.
June 21st, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Reno-Lake Tahoe Olympic Committee has been straining at this goal for decades, never could get out of “Do-It-On-The-Cheap” syndrome. Railway precedent is wonderful in Reno & the Carson Valley; streetcars in Reno, Truckee to Tahoe City trains actually ran out on a pier to meet boats. Progress traded these things for subservience to imported oil. Happy motoring!
Fortunately for the people in Carson City, the old Virginia & Truckee corridor is somewhat intact, so an electric railway can eventually connect the State Capitol of Nevada with the rail main & airport in Reno.
This wicked generation of penny-pinching electeds & transport planning is about to be swept aside by realities of energy supply. About time. A few will change hats in time to finish their careers, the ones that get Peaking Oil savvy ASAP, and look at websites like “spv.co.uk” so they can be the ones in the meetings that are rail corridor savvy. Try also, Richard Heinberg’s “Museletter 185″-
On the California side, CalTrans Director Will Kempton has old (unabridged) copies of the 1995 Tahoe-Reno I-80/US50 Rail Corridor Study. Later Editions dropped discussion and details of rail on the US50 Corridor. Rail actually looks quite good on the 50 route, with plenteous hydropower enroute. These rail features were unceremoniously dismissed by the Olympics wannabes in the Tahoe region; they were fronts for the road gang, truth be told! The smart ones are changing their tune…
Olympics Committees are respectfully directed to “The Association For The Study Of Peak Oil & Gas” (peakoil.net) Newsletters 42 & 89, articles 374 & 1037, respectively. Parallel Bar Therapy.
June 23rd, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Parallel Bar Therapy. ha..ha.. Good one, Gunnar.