<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security Risk?</title>
	<link>http://www.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2007/03/22/security-risk/</link>
	<description>Mass Transit's editor, Fred Jandt, speaks weekly on critical issues facing the public transportation industry.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Radelt</title>
		<link>http://www.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2007/03/22/security-risk/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Radelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.masstransitmag.com/interactive/2007/03/22/security-risk/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Thsi article sure makes a lot of sense. I agree that we need tightened security for transit systems, but let's spread the funds appropriately and make sure we are "looking at security as a whole and not just pick those "high risk" targets." Terrorists will look for easier targets and sometimes get the same scare whether it is a high risk or low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thsi article sure makes a lot of sense. I agree that we need tightened security for transit systems, but let&#8217;s spread the funds appropriately and make sure we are &#8220;looking at security as a whole and not just pick those &#8220;high risk&#8221; targets.&#8221; Terrorists will look for easier targets and sometimes get the same scare whether it is a high risk or low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
