A Mutual Responsibility: Handling Emergency Situations

Oct. 30, 2012

Since the days of 9/11, changes in how we live our everyday lives have been occurring with greater regularity. Safety and security are at the forefront of many minds, whether it is avoiding another terrorist attack or taking care of hurricane victims. Cameras are placed in many locations we would have never dreamed of. We get x-rayed just to get on a plane. As a nation we have tried to become more proactive and less reactive, sometimes for our benefit and sometimes to our detriment.

However, it is not always possible to be proactive. Sometimes having the correct response is essential in minimizing the impact of an emergency or natural disaster. In regards to the transit industry, the importance of working together cannot be understated. Agencies must be able to work with local law enforcement, federal and state authorities to deal with emergencies and security issues.

Earlier in 2012, APTA hosted a Transit Security Communications Drill at its Marketing and Communications Workshop. The drill — the first of its kind — covered multiple emergency scenarios that could possibly be encountered, with transit agency professionals, as well as representatives from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) taking part.

"The transit table-top exercise that was conducted at the APTA Communications conference was an effort to get transit communications professionals focused on the vital roles they would play in the event of a terrorist incident," says Lisa Farbstein, Office of Public Affairs, Transportation Security Administration (TSA), "and to get them thinking about some of the issues and challenges that they will face in informing their passengers and the general public if an incident does occur. I think it was valuable because it got the transit officials thinking about what they should do to prepare for an attack and what their role will be should something arise. It also was to raise their awareness of how a terrorist incident on another mass transit system may ultimately affect their own agency and how they will need to communicate to their passengers."

"While I have years of media relations experience and represent two public transportation entities, I had never participated in a drill that included communicators from public transport systems, as well as the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration and the Federal Transit Administration," says Luna Salaver, public information officer, BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) and Capital Corridors Joint Powers Authority, Oakland, Calif. " It was an opportunity for transit communicators to hear what their colleagues do during a disaster, learn what practices are in place and share effective communications tools as well."

"The MARTA (Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) Police Department every year hosts a tabletop drill and full-scale exercise for all agency departments throughout MARTA to practice and prepare our emergency plans," says Cara Hodgson, manager of communications, MARTA, Atlanta, Ga. "During these extremely effective and beneficial drills, we also work with our local law enforcement agencies and emergency responders. The APTA Transit Security Communications Drill was an excellent opportunity to take our local preparation efforts to a national level and learn more about coordinating with federal agencies in the case of an emergency incident that impacted transit systems across the country."

The drill itself was a minute-by-minute exercise of what actions are taken, both at a federal and regional level, when a threat to transit occurs in different parts of the nation on the same day. The evolving nature of the terrorist threat requires a regular evaluation on how efficient and effective operations can be, to build on successes and to continuously improve.

"I came away with a stronger knowledge of the communications steps, both internally and externally, that our federal partners take to keep transportation, security and elected officials, and the public informed," says Salavar. "This lesson underscored the vital need for inter-agency communications and relationships during a crisis."

Always Room for Improvement

No one is saying that there is not more work to be done, however. Transit agencies strive to become more intelligence-driven and provide the most effective security in the most efficient manner, but there is always opportunity to improve, learning lessons from past experiences as well as using new technologies and ideas. 

"One of the biggest lessons that we all learned from the drill is that no matter the size of your transit system there is always the potential for a terrorist attack to occur and you need to be prepared," says Hodgson. "No one should ever feel that they are immune from being impacted by this kind of emergency incident."

"What surprised me the most [in the workshop] was how little communication currently exists between the transit agencies and government agencies such as the TSA and DHS," says Bonnie Arnold, public information officer, South Florida Regional Transportation Authority, Pompano Beach, Fla.

"One thing that we often discuss on a local level is that we don't want the first time we meet and work with our local law enforcement agencies and emergency responders to be during an incident," Hodgson continues. "The APTA drill gave us as transit communicators the opportunity to meet our federal transit and emergency response agency counterparts and familiarize ourselves with their agencies. The drill also gave the group an overview of which agencies would be the decision-makers and provide assistance to transit systems during a national emergency."

There is a need for those communicating to work on big picture projects, including updating crisis communications plans and committing to internal and regional drills and training to keep on top of new technological tools. Many of the necessary steps to take when a disaster strikes are often common sense.

"I came away feeling that there was a tremendous amount of work still to be done," says Arnold. "I'm especially seeing it now because the final presidential debate will be hosted in our community and there has been a great deal of collaboration between agencies to see that it comes off successfully and safely."

"I left the [APTA] security workshop feeling comfortable that overall, inter-agency communications is viewed as a critical element to disaster relief; however, communicators in the public sector can't rest on our laurels," says Salavar. "To bring inter-agency communications to its optimal level we must be diligent in how we view it and how we nurture it. A severe crisis on public transit can quickly evolve into a Hydra, with several of your departments busy flaying each head just to get the system back in operation. Knowing we can count on other agencies to help address a crisis, having those contacts in easy reach via phone, email, text messaging or whatever avenue you use, is a powerful tool."

Not All Emergencies are the Same

Every emergency situation is different and impacts transit operations and administrative functions in a different way. This can change the process of inter-agency communication.

"Communications to other agencies are handled differently dependent on the scenario," says Salavar. "BART has developed standard procedures for any situation, whether it's an incident involving a third party threat to the system to a major earthquake.  BART Police Department and our transportation/operations staff would deal with a terrorist threat one way, versus a different type of emergency, such as a fire on or near the tracks. In general, public transit agencies, given the volume of people we handle daily, have developed standard emergency response procedures that involve inter-agency communications."

"In the case of a weather emergency such as a winter storm, employees might not be able to report to their offices so it's important to consider how employees could work remotely to keep operations functioning," says Hodgson. "As such, MARTA's annual drills always involve different scenarios so that we can work through the varying response and recovery efforts that would be required."

"We have a working group called the South Florida Media Coalition that gets together on a monthly basis to address such issues," says Arnold. "It includes representatives from transit agencies and emergency responders such as police, and fire rescue as well as PIOs from such agencies as the Red Cross. It also includes working members of the media.  When these issues come up, be they natural or man-made disasters, this is the group that will respond to them."

Is Money an Object?  

As with most anything, money also plays a part in emergency responses. Financial aspects can decide the fate of programs designed to provide security. Local and national politics can affect the amount of grants to transit agencies to invest in security as well. Transit professionals remain optimistic.

"Many public entities are working with limited dollars these days," says Salavar. "What helps is the overarching mindset that budgeting efforts toward effective communications is a great investment in your system." 

"I believe that a significant effort is being made locally and nationally by transit systems and their partners to prepare and train for emergency incidents, says Hodgson. "The federal government is a great partner in providing support to help transit systems conduct emergency drills and update their preparedness plans."

"I think a great deal of progress has been made in the area we serve," Arnold agrees. "I believe my agency invests time and money sufficiently to make it effective and adequate."

ISAC and PAG Promote Communication

The Department of Homeland Security provides funding to APTA as the designated lead to operate the Public Transit-Information Sharing Analysis Center (PT-ISAC). The partnership of TSA, APTA and the FTA works collaboratively to streamline the information sharing environment within public transit and eliminate redundancy.

The TSA engages in dialogue with its transit partners through regularly scheduled Transit Community Information Sharing calls to the members of the Public Transportation Information Sharing Analysis Center (PT-ISAC). The ISAC has the means to share or push information out to the transit community as a whole. The process begins with a TSA alerts message, with follow-up teleconferences with the mass transit and passenger rail industry. The ISAC is able to generate a widespread broadcast or a secondary message to the transit community at large. 

The TSA has also established, and works closely with, the Transit Policing and Security Peer Advisory Group (PAG). The group is comprised of approximately two dozen transit police chiefs from across the nation, with a mission to reduce the risk of terrorism and intentional harm to mass transit assets, passengers and employees as well as to identify funding, equipment and other resources to achieve that end. PAG acts as a liaison between the transit industry and TSA and other government agencies through monthly conference calls and annual meetings with the TSA Administrator.

For example, if there is a terrorist incident in Transit Agency X, a PAG call would likely be convened to get the transit police chiefs of these transit agencies together on the call to loop them into the Critical Incident Management Group so that they could be briefed and updated during the incident. PAG could also be used to find out what these transit agencies are doing to enhance their security in light of what happened at Transit Agency X.

Perhaps the Police Chief of one of the transit agencies they would like to utilize more bomb dogs in their rail system. The TSA might be able to help get more bomb dogs to assist. Or perhaps a transit agency lets others on the conference call know that they are implementing these steps to enhance security of its passengers. The PAG group and regular conference calls offer a platform for the exchange of information among these transit security leaders in an efficient way. PAG is helping them come together.

"Don't wait until a catastrophe to exchange business cards," says Salavar "Make the effort to build relationships with your fellow communicators.  Yes, we are busy. Yes, public transportation communicators are often over tasked, but knowing who to turn to when a disaster strikes is golden. Those extracurricular meetings are worth the investment in your time. I truly believe we've developed strong working relationships and as a unit there's no Hydra we can't face."